Atnaujintas knygų su minimaliais defektais pasiūlymas! Naršykite ČIA >>

Understanding World War 2 Combat Infantrymen In the European Theater: Testing the Sufficiency of Army Research Branch Surveys and Infantry Combatant Recollections Against the Insights of Credible War Correspondents, Combat Photographers, Army Cartoonists

-15% su kodu: ENG15
28,22 
Įprasta kaina: 33,20 
-15% su kodu: ENG15
Kupono kodas: ENG15
Akcija baigiasi: 2025-03-03
-15% su kodu: ENG15
28,22 
Įprasta kaina: 33,20 
-15% su kodu: ENG15
Kupono kodas: ENG15
Akcija baigiasi: 2025-03-03
-15% su kodu: ENG15
2025-02-28 33.2000 InStock
Nemokamas pristatymas į paštomatus per 11-15 darbo dienų užsakymams nuo 20,00 

Knygos aprašymas

Merriam Press World War 2 History. Most scholarship on the American role in the European Theater of Operations (ETO) during World War II has addressed the issues of strategy, campaign outcomes, command leadership, and logistical support. Other research efforts have provided insights into the experiences of the individual combatants. Karsten offers a better grasp of these latter efforts, utilizing evidence that has been underutilized. What he asks in this unique work is whether the media (journalists, broadcasters, combat photographers, cartoonists and artists) in the ETO during WWII significantly improved our understanding of the world of the American infantryman there. 57 illustrations.

Informacija

Autorius: Peter Karsten
Leidėjas: Lulu.com
Išleidimo metai: 2020
Knygos puslapių skaičius: 144
ISBN-10: 1678115401
ISBN-13: 9781678115401
Formatas: 229 x 152 x 8 mm. Knyga minkštu viršeliu
Kalba: Anglų

Pirkėjų atsiliepimai

Parašykite atsiliepimą apie „Understanding World War 2 Combat Infantrymen In the European Theater: Testing the Sufficiency of Army Research Branch Surveys and Infantry Combatant Recollections Against the Insights of Credible War Correspondents, Combat Photographers, Army Cartoonists“

Būtina įvertinti prekę

Goodreads reviews for „Understanding World War 2 Combat Infantrymen In the European Theater: Testing the Sufficiency of Army Research Branch Surveys and Infantry Combatant Recollections Against the Insights of Credible War Correspondents, Combat Photographers, Army Cartoonists“