Atnaujintas knygų su minimaliais defektais pasiūlymas! Naršykite ČIA >>

The Radical Choice and Moral Theory: Through Communicative Argumentation to Phenomenological Subjectivity

-15% su kodu: ENG15
143,97 
Įprasta kaina: 169,38 
-15% su kodu: ENG15
Kupono kodas: ENG15
Akcija baigiasi: 2025-03-03
-15% su kodu: ENG15
143,97 
Įprasta kaina: 169,38 
-15% su kodu: ENG15
Kupono kodas: ENG15
Akcija baigiasi: 2025-03-03
-15% su kodu: ENG15
2025-02-28 169.3800 InStock
Nemokamas pristatymas į paštomatus per 11-15 darbo dienų užsakymams nuo 20,00 

Knygos aprašymas

In a crisp, original style the author approaches the crucial question of moral theory, the `is--ought' problem via communicative argumentation. Moving to the end of Habermas's conception of the communicative action, he introduces the concept of `radical choice' as the key to the transition from the descriptive to the normative. Phenomenological subjectivity of the intersubjective life-world is being vindicated as the `arch-value' of all derivative values, or the first principle for all normative precepts. With exceptional acumen and mastery of the philosophical argument, the author -- a young native Chinese lately trained in a Western university -- delineates a fascinating route along which the philosophical question of justification raised in the analytic tradition can be answered on the basis of phenomenology. A noteworthy contribution to the interplay between the Anglo--American and Continental schools of philosophy.

Informacija

Autorius: Zhenming Zhai
Serija: Analecta Husserliana
Leidėjas: Springer Netherlands
Išleidimo metai: 2012
Knygos puslapių skaičius: 212
ISBN-10: 9401042233
ISBN-13: 9789401042239
Formatas: 223 x 152 x 12 mm. Knyga minkštu viršeliu
Kalba: Anglų

Pirkėjų atsiliepimai

Parašykite atsiliepimą apie „The Radical Choice and Moral Theory: Through Communicative Argumentation to Phenomenological Subjectivity“

Būtina įvertinti prekę

Goodreads reviews for „The Radical Choice and Moral Theory: Through Communicative Argumentation to Phenomenological Subjectivity“